Difference between revisions of "Endangered Species Act (ESA) (United States)"

From CCoWS Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Recovery plans and land acquisition)
(Recovery plans and land acquisition)
Line 30: Line 30:
  
 
===Recovery plans and land acquisition===
 
===Recovery plans and land acquisition===
Species recovery, as defined by [[USFWS]], is “the process by which the decline of an endangered or threatened species is arrested or reversed, and threats removed or reduced so that the species’ survival in the wild can be ensured”.<ref name="USFWS1"> [http://www.fws.gov/Midwest/endangered/glossary/index.html USFWS Endangered Species Glossary]</ref> In 1978, Congress amended the ESA to require responsible parties (currently [[USFWS]] and [[NOAA]]) to create and carry out recovery plans for listed species. Congress again amended the ESA in 1988 because recovery plans had been highly unsuccessful and too ambiguous to deliver significant results. With the revisions, recovery plans were obliged to outline site-specific management actions, standards to determine recovery effectiveness, costs associated with completion of plans, and strategy execution schedules.<ref name="Hoekstra">[http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[0630:ACROES]2.0.CO;2/abstract A comprehensive review of Endangered Species Act recovery plans]</ref> Recovery plans could include land acquisition or the procurement of habitat to preserve listed species. Recovery plans were successfully completed for 1,143 species as of Sept. 2012.<ref name="Marrone"/>
+
Species recovery, as defined by [[USFWS]], is “the process by which the decline of an endangered or threatened species is arrested or reversed, and threats removed or reduced so that the species’ survival in the wild can be ensured”.<ref name="USFWS1"> [http://www.fws.gov/Midwest/endangered/glossary/index.html USFWS Endangered Species Glossary]</ref> In 1978, Congress amended the ESA to require responsible parties (currently [[USFWS]] and [[NOAA]]) to create and carry out recovery plans for listed species. Congress again amended the ESA in 1988 because recovery plans had been highly unsuccessful and too ambiguous to deliver significant results. With the revisions, recovery plans were obliged to outline site-specific management actions, standards to determine recovery effectiveness, costs associated with completion of plans, and strategy execution schedules.<ref name="Hoekstra">[http://www.jstor.org.library2.csumb.edu:2048/stable/3060971?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents A comprehensive review of Endangered Species Act recovery plans]</ref> Recovery plans could include land acquisition or the procurement of habitat to preserve listed species. Recovery plans were successfully completed for 1,143 species as of Sept. 2012.<ref name="Marrone"/>
  
 
===Consultation===
 
===Consultation===

Revision as of 22:03, 10 April 2016

Endangered Species Act (ESA) logo

The Endangered Species Act (ESA) was signed into existence by President Richard Nixon in 1973 with the objective to protect the flora and fauna of the United States from extinction. The ESA approach to animal, plant, and habitat conservation involves listing species as endangered or threatened, protecting their suitable habitats, and restoring healthy populations. The ultimate goal is species removal from the endangered list.[1] The ESA is primarily administered by the US Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

History

Since colonization, the United States has experienced alarming and unprecedented rates of habitat destruction and species extinction. The first notable species to become scarce that was once abundant was the American bison in the 1800s; the disappearance of bison from grasslands caused concern nationwide.[2] Significantly lower numbers of other species, particularly the country’s symbolic Bald Eagle, spurred the extinction prevention movement.[1] In addition to setting guidelines for extinction prevention, the ESA also addressed previous governmental conservation efforts that were largely ineffective. The first attempt at wildlife conservation in the United States was the Lacey Act in 1900, which prohibited commercial trade of wildlife obtained illegally in or outside the United States.[3] The next two attempts at wildlife conservation legislation were precursors to the current ESA, the first being the Endangered Species Preservation Act of 1966, followed three years later by the Endangered Species Conservation Act. There was still a pressing need for more drastic, detailed measures to protect at-risk plant and animal species, thus the ESA was developed.

Legislation Overview

Major sections

The ESA has been amended over time, but several sections have continued to hold the most authority. Section 3 defines terms common in the document itself, some for the first time in the United States. Section 4 contains definitions of endangered and threatened species. It also states rules for species listing, critical habitat designation, and recovery plans. Section 6 of the ESA details State cooperation and collaboration; Section 7 lays out rules for federal agencies to avoid adversely affecting listed species and habitats; Section 9 bans the “take” or harm of a listed species. Section 11 lays out penalties and enforcement of the stipulations of the ESA, and includes information on citizen suits.[4][1][5]

Defining threatened and endangered species

In Section 4 of the ESA, threatened and endangered species are characterized by one or more of the following conditions:[4][1]

  • present or threatened destruction, modification, or curtailment of habitat or range
  • over-utilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or educational purposes
  • declining populations due to disease and/or predation
  • inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms
  • other natural or man-made factors affecting continued existence

Therefore, ESA definitions of threatened and endangered species are not based on a quantitative standard, but rather allow for different species (and some subspecies) to be described according to their unique ecology.[5] Verbatim, the ESA defines a threatened species as “any species which is likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range”.[4] Endangered species are defined as “any species which is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range.” ESA protection encompasses all animals, but is reduced for plant species and nonexistent for organisms classified as neither plant nor animal.[5]

The listing process

There are two avenues for a threatened or endangered species to become listed, that is, to be officially added to the endangered or threatened species lists and afforded protection by the ESA. USFWS and NOAA can directly place a candidate species into the listing procedure; it usually takes around a year to get a species listed.[1][5] Alternatively, individuals, groups, and state agencies can petition to put a species on the threatened or endangered lists by submitting data concerning the ecology, spread, and risk associated with that species. The petition is then reviewed by USFWS or NOAA and more research is conducted to determine if the species is indeed threatened or endangered. After a species is listed, its wellbeing is reviewed every five years.[1]

Critical habitat

Habitat loss is a leading cause of extinction, and has been addressed accordingly in the ESA. One of the key objectives of the ESA is to identify and protect areas essential to the continued existence of species, termed critical habitat. Critical habitat includes geographic range of the species in question, but also extends to cover areas not currently occupied by the species, yet regarded as crucial to its recovery and survival. Critical habitat receives protection from development and other human impacts.[1][5] Therefore, under ESA regulations it is not only illegal to harm or kill an individual of a listed species, it is also against the law to harm its critical habitat.[6]

Recovery plans and land acquisition

Species recovery, as defined by USFWS, is “the process by which the decline of an endangered or threatened species is arrested or reversed, and threats removed or reduced so that the species’ survival in the wild can be ensured”.[7] In 1978, Congress amended the ESA to require responsible parties (currently USFWS and NOAA) to create and carry out recovery plans for listed species. Congress again amended the ESA in 1988 because recovery plans had been highly unsuccessful and too ambiguous to deliver significant results. With the revisions, recovery plans were obliged to outline site-specific management actions, standards to determine recovery effectiveness, costs associated with completion of plans, and strategy execution schedules.[8] Recovery plans could include land acquisition or the procurement of habitat to preserve listed species. Recovery plans were successfully completed for 1,143 species as of Sept. 2012.[5]

Consultation

Citizen suits

Collaboration with states

The ESA in California

Success stories

Notable court cases

Associated Laws and Regulations

  • Lacey Act 1900
  • Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) 1915
  • Bald Eagle Protection Act 1940
  • Endangered Species Preservation Act 1966
  • Endangered Species Conservation Act of 1969
  • California Endangered Species Act (CESA) 1970

Links

http://www.fws.gov/ENDANGERED/laws-policies/index.html

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 Citizen's Guide to the Endangered Species Act
  2. The Endangered Species Act: History, Conservation Biology, and Public Policy
  3. Lacey Act
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 Endangered Species Act
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 Endangered Species Act: Provisions, Policies, and Considerations
  6. Preemptive habitat destruction under the Endangered Species Act
  7. USFWS Endangered Species Glossary
  8. A comprehensive review of Endangered Species Act recovery plans

Disclaimer

This page may contain student work completed as part of assigned coursework. It may not be accurate. It does not necessary reflect the opinion or policy of CSUMB, its staff, or students.