Difference between revisions of "Hydrology and Water Quality CEQA Mitigation Measures"

Revision as of 14:24, 27 March 2013

Summary

The [California Environmental Quality Act] (CEQA) (talk about [NEPA] too) does not directly regulate land uses. Instead, it requires that state and local agencies consider and disclose the potential environmental impacts of a proposed project. CEQA states that projects should not be approved as proposed if there are feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures available which would substantially lessen the significant environmental effects of such projects (PRC § 21002).

Part of the [CEQA process] involves determining the type of environmental impacts likely to result and for that initial assessment a [checklist] is used. The 17 item checklist includes Hydrology and Water Quality, which the [CEQA Handbook] defines as need to evaluate and describe the impacts of specific projects on surface and groundwater resources (including aquifer characteristics and water quality), and for the project site to generate runoff that could affect flooding or drainage characteristics (both on-site and downstream), or to be affected by flooding from storm events or dam failure inundation. The availability of water supplies and infrastructure to serve LRDP and project demand should be addressed in the [Public Services and Utilities and Energy] sections.

Standards of Significance

To determine whether a project will cause a [significant effect] on the hydrology or water quality, it must be evaluated whether the project would:

Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements;

Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with :groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or :a lowering of the local groundwater table level (i.e., the production rate of :pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing :land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted);

Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including :through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which :would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site;

Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including :through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially :increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in :flooding on- or off-site;

Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or :planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of :polluted runoff;

Otherwise substantially degrade water quality;

Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area, as mapped on a federal Flood :Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map;

Place structures within a 100-year flood hazard area that would impede or :redirect flood flows;

Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death :involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or :dam; or

Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?