Difference between revisions of "National Heritage Areas (NHA)"

From CCoWS Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Heritage Management Plans)
(NHAs Relevant to the Range of the Condor NHA)
Line 93: Line 93:
  
 
; Mountains to Sound Greenway National Heritage Area : <ref>[https://mtsgreenway.org Mountains to Sound Greenway National Heritage Area web site]</ref>
 
; Mountains to Sound Greenway National Heritage Area : <ref>[https://mtsgreenway.org Mountains to Sound Greenway National Heritage Area web site]</ref>
The Greenway NHA was designated by Congress in 2019. The purpose of this NHA for long-term stewardship of the land. The area is used for various activities, including nature and wildlife conservation, cultural and traditional practices, and outdoor recreation and education <ref> https://mtsgreenway.org/about/mission/ </ref> . The Greenway Trust has a 60-member Board of Directors, a 40-member Board of Advisors, a 50-member Technical Advisory Council, various staff members, conservation corps crew members, advisory committees, interest groups, and citizen groups <ref> https://mtsgreenway.org/about/leadership/ </ref>
+
The Greenway NHA was designated by Congress in 2019. The purpose of this NHA for long-term stewardship of the land. The area is used for various activities, including nature and wildlife conservation, cultural and traditional practices, and outdoor recreation and education <ref> https://mtsgreenway.org/about/mission/ </ref> . The Greenway Trust has a 60-member Board of Directors, a 40-member Board of Advisors, a 50-member Technical Advisory Council, various staff members, conservation corps crew members, advisory committees, interest groups, and citizen groups <ref> https://mtsgreenway.org/about/leadership/ </ref>.
; Illinois and Michigan Canal National Heritage Area : ...
+
The Illinois and Michigan Canal National Heritage is recognized as the first NHA and was signed into law by President Regan in 1984. The area has many functions and uses, including walking paths, recreation, fishing, kayaking, rafting, canoeing, and is home to many museums and historical sites. The Illinois and Michigan Canal NHA has a partnership with the Abraham Lincoln NHA and have many supporters such as the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library and Museum and the Black Metropolis National Heritage Area Commission <ref> https://iandmcanal.org/partners-and-contributors/ </ref>.  The management entity is the Canal Corridor Association <ref> https://iandmcanal.org/about-us-canal-corridor-association/ </ref>.
+
; Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta National Heritage Area : ...
+
 
+
; Tennessee Civil War National Heritage Area : ...
+
  
 
== NHAs in California's Central Coast Region ==
 
== NHAs in California's Central Coast Region ==

Revision as of 16:07, 9 March 2021

An environmental summary by the ENVS 560/L Watershed Systems class at CSUMB with relevance to the Central Coast region and the Range of the Condor National Heritage Area.

National Heritage Areas (NHAs) are nationally important landscapes, recognized for their natural, cultural, and historical resources. NHAs are designated by Congress but created at the request of local organizations and state governments. These areas are administered by local coordinating entities (i.e., local organizations, state governments). The local coordinating entities form a partnership with the National Park Service (NPS), which has a limited advisory role.

The NHA designation fosters a community-driven approach to heritage conservation and economic development. Through public-private partnerships, NHA entities support historic preservation, natural resource conservation, recreation, heritage tourism, and educational projects. Leveraging funds and long-term support for projects, NHA partnerships foster pride of place and an enduring stewardship ethic [1]. NHAs receive limited federal funding and do not affect private property rights [1].

Currently, there are 55 NHAs [2].


How NHAs are formed

Designation as an NHA begins at the local level. A local initiative must consider applying, then following a series of steps:

  • Heritage groups, tourism groups, or jurisdictions decide to pursue designation as a National Heritage Area.
  • The original supporters work to build support, reaching out to other groups, jurisdictions, and the public.
  • A formal feasibility study evaluates the quality of the heritage resources, potential sustainability, and local support for the proposed Heritage Area
  • The National Park Service reviews the feasibility study and advises Congress on the eligibility of the proposed Heritage Area.
  • Congress passes legislation authorizing the Heritage Area (public laws)
  • The new Heritage Area has three years to complete a management plan to meet the local goals of the Heritage Area [3].

Legislation related to NHAs

There is no systemic law outlining a standardized process and criteria for designating NHAs.[4] Indeed the first four areas now included in the NHA system are named "National Heritage Corridors". The first NHA named "National Heritage Area" was the fifth NHA to be designated: the Cane River NHA authorized in 1994.

Some examples of specific legislation enabling NHAs are as follows:

  • On August 21, 1984, President Regan signed the first created NHA, the Illinois & Michigan Canal National Heritage Corridor, into law.[5]
  • On March 30, 2009, President Obama signed the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 (P.L. 111-11). This law is composed of 15 titles and designated millions of acres in the US are protected, it established a National Landscape Conservation System, and provided funding for programs and other activities by the Department of the Interior and the Department of Agriculture [6]. This act designated 10 new NHAs.
  • On March 12, 2019, President Trump signed the John D. Dingell, Jr. Conservation, Management, and Recreation Act (P.L. 116-9). This was the first law to establish new NHAs since the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009. This law protects public lands and modified management provisions. This act designated six new NHAs.
  • Two bills (H.R. 1049 and S. 3217) created during the 116th Congress (January 3, 2019- January 3, 2021) aimed to establish a system to help govern the designation, management, and funding of NHAs [7]. H.R. 1049 passed the House and was read twice in the Senate and has been referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources [8]. S. 3217 S. 3217 has been introduced in the Senate. It was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources [9]. The two laws have similar provisions that aim to establish a standardized NHA system and set out the relationship between the NHAs and the National Park System [10]. These provisions include ensuring that NHAs are not considered units of the National Park Service, requiring that the Secretary of the Interior conduct feasibility studies, or reviewing feasibility studies conducted by groups other than Congress.

Criteria

The National Park Service has the following ten criteria for evaluation of candidate areas by the National Park Service, Congress, and the public:

  • The area has an assemblage of natural, historic, or cultural resources that together represent distinctive aspects of American heritage worthy of recognition, conservation, interpretation, and continuing use, and are best managed as such an assemblage through partnerships among public and private entities, and by combining diverse and sometimes noncontiguous resources and active communities
  • The area reflects traditions, customs, beliefs, and folklife that are a valuable part of the national story
  • The area provides outstanding opportunities to conserve natural, cultural, historic, and/or scenic features
  • The area provides outstanding recreational and educational opportunities
  • Resources that are important to the identified theme or themes of the area retain a degree of integrity capable of supporting interpretation
  • Residents, business interests, nonprofit organizations, and governments within the proposed area that are involved in the planning have developed a conceptual financial plan that outlines the roles for all participants including the federal government, and have demonstrated support for designation of the area
  • The proposed management entity and units of government supporting the designation are willing to commit to working in partnership to develop the heritage area
  • The proposal is consistent with continued economic activity in the area
  • A conceptual boundary map is supported by the public
  • The management entity proposed to plan and implement the project is described

The National Park Service uses these criteria to evaluate potential areas and references them in subsequent testimony before congressional authorizing committees regarding legislation proposing designation of specific national heritage areas.[11].

NHA activities, planning, and administration

Need an explanation of what NHAs actually do. Are they active or passive (i.e. merely designations)? Do they have MOUs where partners commit to certain roles and activities? Are they funded?

Activities

The activities undertaken by NHAs vary widely and include:

  • ... Activity ... Example NHA that does this activity ...
  • Cooperative Agreements

...

  • Public Meetings

NHA legislation often requires the coordinating agency to conduct meetings open to the public at least semiannually to discuss the development and implementation of the management plan.[12][13]

Heritage Management Plans

Typically, the legislation for a NHA will require the development of a management plan within three years of designation. A heritage area management plan is completed by a local management entity[11]. Management plan requirements often differ, but should include: long-range policies, goals, strategies, and actions; an implementation plan with short, mid and long range actions and performance goals; a business plan for the heritage area coordinating entity; and an interpretive plan. NHA management plans are approved by the Secretary of the Interior, which requires the plan to be in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and other federal environmental laws. The NPS provides assistance to Heritage Area entities on the development of management plans to ensure that they address all Federal requirements.[14].

The NPS provides the following guidance documents for NHA management plans:

  • Interpretive Planning for Heritage Areas[15]
  • Business Planning Toolkit for Heritage Areas[16]
  • National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Guide for National Heritage Area Management Plans[17]

NHA administration

  • ...e.g. NHA commissions...
  • National Park Service
  • State governments
  • Local interest groups
  • Memoranda of Understanding

In some NHA legislation, the act will require the coordinating agency to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Secretary of Interior along with state governors and tribal governments participating in the NHA to define, discuss, and plan the objectives and management of the NHA. Two examples of NHAs with this type of MOU are the Oil Region National Heritage Area and the Great Basin National Heritage Area. [18] The coordinating agency may also enter into MOUs with interested partner organizations (i.e., environmental groups, chambers of commerce, etc.) in conjunction with the management plan. These agreements would enable the partner organizations to raise funds for NHA projects and activities that are outlined in the management plan. [19]

Funding

Contemporary NHA legislation provides federal funding authorizations of up to $1 million a year over a 15-year period with a required 50:50 non-federal match to any federal funds from this program, however, newly designated NHAs rarely receive $1 million in the first few years[11].

Typically, for any year a NHA receives federal funds, the management entity will be required:

  • to submit an annual report to the Secretary of the Interior that describes any accomplishments of the management entity and its expenses and income
  • make all records relating to the expenditure of such funds and any matching funds available to the Secretary for audit
  • require, with respect to all agreements authorizing expenditure of Federal funds by other organizations, that the receiving organizations make available to the Secretary for audit all records concerning the expenditure of such funds.[20]

NHAs Relevant to the Range of the Condor NHA

Really need to find examples similar to RCNHA i.e. that (1) have a mission focused on conservation & open-space-based recreationN, and/or (2) are founded on inter-agency federal partnerships. Maybe it would help to build a table of selected existing NHAs with columns that address these attributes.

Mountains to Sound Greenway National Heritage Area 
[21]

The Greenway NHA was designated by Congress in 2019. The purpose of this NHA for long-term stewardship of the land. The area is used for various activities, including nature and wildlife conservation, cultural and traditional practices, and outdoor recreation and education [22] . The Greenway Trust has a 60-member Board of Directors, a 40-member Board of Advisors, a 50-member Technical Advisory Council, various staff members, conservation corps crew members, advisory committees, interest groups, and citizen groups [23].

NHAs in California's Central Coast Region

The only NHA in California's Central Coast region is the proposed Range of the Condor National Heritage Area. The only existing NHA in California is the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta National Heritage Area.

Links

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 https://www.nps.gov/articles/what-is-a-national-heritage-area.htm
  2. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL33462.pdf
  3. https://www.cityofgigharbor.net/DocumentCenter/View/561/Background-Information-PDF
  4. White paper on NHAs by Vincent and Comay (2013) later updated 2020
  5. P.L. 98-398
  6. https://www.congress.gov/bill/111th-congress/house-bill/146
  7. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL33462.pdf
  8. https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/1049
  9. https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/3217
  10. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL33462.pdf
  11. 11.0 11.1 11.2 https://www.nps.gov/subjects/heritageareas/upload/NHA-Feasibility-Study-Guidelines_FINAL-Revisions-2019_508-compliant.pdf
  12. https://www.congress.gov/111/plaws/publ11/PLAW-111publ11.pdf
  13. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-108publ447/html/PLAW-108publ447.htm
  14. https://www.nps.gov/subjects/heritageareas/management-plans.htm
  15. https://www.nps.gov/subjects/heritageareas/upload/Interp-Planning-Toolkit-for-Heritage-Areas-Historic-Trails-and-Gateways-2.pdf
  16. https://www.nps.gov/subjects/heritageareas/upload/Business_Planning_for_HeritageAreasToolkit.pdf
  17. https://www.nps.gov/subjects/heritageareas/upload/NHA-NEPA-Guidance_4-15-13-FINAL-2.pdf
  18. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BILLS-107hr695rs/html/BILLS-107hr695rs.htm
  19. https://cawaterlibrary.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Delta_NHA_Study.pdf
  20. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-108publ447/html/PLAW-108publ447.htm
  21. Mountains to Sound Greenway National Heritage Area web site
  22. https://mtsgreenway.org/about/mission/
  23. https://mtsgreenway.org/about/leadership/

Disclaimer

This page may contain student work completed as part of assigned coursework. It may not be accurate. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion or policy of CSUMB, its staff, or students.