Difference between revisions of "TMDL for Nutrients in Lower Salinas River Watershed, Monterey County, California"

From CCoWS Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Problem Statement)
(Problem Statement)
Line 95: Line 95:
 
Shaelyn
 
Shaelyn
  
Beneficial Uses (BUs) of Listed Waterways
+
'''Beneficial Uses (BUs) of Listed Waterways'''
 
{| border="3"
 
{| border="3"
 
!style="background: #efefef;" | Waterbody
 
!style="background: #efefef;" | Waterbody

Revision as of 20:01, 7 April 2011

This summary page is based on the Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region progress report on Total Maximum Daily Load for Nutrients and other TMDL projects for the Lower Salinas River Watershed, in Monterey County, California. This summary was prepared by the Spring 2011 ENVS 560/L Watershed Systems class at CSUMB.

Project Definition

The California Regional Water Quality Control Board for the Central Coast Region (CCRWQCB) is currently developing a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) project for nutrients in the Lower Salinas River Watershed in Monterey County. The CCRWQCB presented a progress report in June 2010 that contains background information, provisional nutrient targets, and a compilation of water quality data of water bodies in the region. Although the progress report identifies potential sources of nutrient loads, the source analysis portion of the TMDL project is still pending.

This TMDL project will address the nutrient related impairments in the 303(d) listed water bodies of the Lower Salinas River watershed. The 2006 303(d) List of Impaired Waterbodies is the current and active list for the California Central Coast. In 2010 the CCRWQCB presented an updated list in its 2010 Integrated Report, but this report is still waiting for approval by the USEPA. The following table contains the water bodies and the nutrient-related reason for their listing in both the 2006 active list and in the 2010 list:


Water Body 2006 Listed Impairment 2010 Listed Impairment
Alisal Creek Nutrient Chlorophyll-a, Nitrate
Alisal Slough Not Listed Low Dissolved Oxygen, Nitrate
Blanco Drain Not Listed Low Dissolved Oxygen, Nitrate
Chualar Creek Not Listed Ammonia (Unionized), Nitrate
Esperanza Creek Not Listed Nitrate
Espinosa Slough Not Listed Ammonia (Unionized), Nitrate
Gabilan Creek Nitrate Ammonia (Unionized), Nitrate
Merrit Ditch Not Listed Ammonia (Unionized), Low Dissolved Oxygen, Nitrate
Moro Cojo Slough Ammonia (Unionized),Low Dissolved Oxygen Ammonia (Unionized), Low Dissolved Oxygen
Natividad Creek Nitrate Ammonia (Unionized), Low Dissolved Oxygen
Old Salinas River Not Listed Chlorophyll-a, Low Dissolved Oxygen, Nitrate
Old Salinas River Estuary Ammonia (Unionized), Low Dissolved Oxygen, Nutrients Nutrients
Quail Creek Nutrients Ammonia (Unionized), Low Dissolved Oxygen, Nitrate
Salinas Reclamation Canal Ammonia (Unionized), Low Dissolved Oxygen Ammonia (Unionized), Low Dissolved Oxygen, Nitrate
Salinas River (lower, estuary to near Gonzales Rd

Crossing)

Nitrate, Nutrients Nitrate
Salinas River Lagoon (North) Nutrients Nutrients
Santa Rita Creek Nitrate Ammonia (Unionized), Low Dissolved Oxygen, Nitrate
Tembladero Slough Ammonia (Unionized), Nutrients Chlorophyll-a, Nitrate, Nutrients


Problem Statement

Shaelyn

Beneficial Uses (BUs) of Listed Waterways

Waterbody MUN AGR PRO IND GWR REC1 REC2 WILD COLD WARM MIGR SPWN BIOL RARE EST FRESH COMM SHELL
Old Salinas River Estuary X X X X X X X X X X X X
Salinas River Lagoon (North) X X X X X X X X X X X X
Tembladero Slough X X X X X X X X X
Espinosa Lake X X X X X
Espinosa Slough X X X X X
Salinas Reclamation Canal X X X X X
Alisal Creek X X X X X X X X X X
Blanco Drain X X X X X
Salinas River, dnstr of Spreckels Gage X X X X X X X X X
Salinas River,Chualar to Spreckles X X X X X X X X X X X X
  • Municipal and Domestic suppy (MUN)
  • Agriculture (AGR)
  • Industrial Process (PRO)
  • Industrial Service (IND)
  • Ground Water Recharge (GWR)
  • Water Contact Recreation (REC1)
  • Non-Contact Water Recreation (REC2)
  • Cold Freshwater Habitat (COLD)
  • Warm Freshwater Habitat (WARM)
  • Estuarine Habitat (EST)
  • Wildlife Habitat (WILD)
  • Rare, Threatened, or Endangered Species (RARE)
  • Migration of Aquatic Organisms (MIGR)
  • Spawning, Reproduction, and/or Early Development (SPWN)
  • Biological Habitats of Special Significance (BIOL)
  • Shellfish Harvesting (SHELL)
  • Commercial and Sport Fishing (COMM)
  • Freshwater replenishment (FRESH)

Data Analysis

Shaelyn

Numeric Target

Kathy

Linkage Analysis

Kathy

TMDL Development

Natalie

  • target concentration

The TMDL target for nutrients for the lower Salinas valley is identified as a numeric target. The target concentrations vary based on the locations of the water bodies within the Salinas Valley. These preliminary target concentrations are based on the 95th percentile of CCAMP reference sites. These reference sites might not be representative of "valley floor streams, sloughs and water conveyance structures"(progress report), which are more commonly found in the Salinas Valley.

The target allowable concentrations are established for phosphorus and nitrogen. The allowable numeric targets were calculated using the NNE (nutrient numeric endpoints) benthic biomass predictor tool. This tool predicts biological responses based on nutrient conditions present in the water body. The numeric targets for nutrient concentration are temperature dependent. The classifications for water temperature are either warm or cold. Parameters that are included in the predictor tool include nutrients (natural and anthropogenic), canopy closure, water temp, latitude, flow velocity and depth.

  • goal
  • allowable levels
    • The provisional target concentrations are -table on page 107
  • example?

Margin of Safety

Natalie

A margin of safety is used to account for the uncertainty in the linkage between nutrient loads and nutrient the nutrient pollutant concentrations in the receiving water body.

  • SLO calculated nutrient TMDL margin of safety "based on the difference between the total maximum daily load and the allocated load"
    • "takes into account any lack of knowledge concerning the relationship between effluent limitations and water quality"
  • Uncertainties accounted for in the margin of safety include...
    • limited data(how many years do we have?)
    • these discrete values have been estimated based on a specific amount of parameters and categorized primarily based on temperature and does not necessarily account for the interaction of the parameters
    • model may not be represnetative of the actual environmental conditions
  • rain patterns vary from one year to the next so dilutions vary
  • is it built in?
  • whats the order of magnitude-range of margins of saftey
    • the basis for this
    • typical example
  • range that one might want to consider is ...

Critical Conditions and Seasonal Variation

The TMDL progress report has not addressed the “critical” environmental factor for nutrient loading in the Lower Salinas River Watershed, in which a slight change could lead to exceeding the water quality objectives. However, the progress report does specify some indicators that can impair the beneficial uses of the regional water bodies (progress report).

Previous TMDLs in the Lower Salinas River Watershed have not included critical conditions (TMDLs in the Monterey Bay Region of California), however critical conditions for a Nutrient TMDL may be advisable due to the high occurrence of nutrient loading for agriculture in the Salinas Valley. The TMDL approved for the Santa Clara River in 2003 included critical condition (Santa Clara River Nitrogen TMDL). Although the climate around the Santa Clara River is drier, that water body is similar to the Lower Salinas River in seasonal flow and the effects of the first big storm (first flush). Although not a perfect approach (Keller et al. 2004), the Santa Clara River TMDL makes an attempt to incorporate the increased impairment hazard presented by seasonal variation [1].

TMDL Allocations

Roger

Public Participation

  • Central Coast Water Board often present TMDL project reports at public meetings to solicit comments during different stages and to present preliminary findings of the report.
  • Public comments should be incorporated into the report where appropriate.
  • California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) issues will likely need to be addressed. Staff should prepare documents to demonstrate any potential impacts and present alternative schemes and implementation strategies.

Implementation and Monitoring

Michelle

Implementation

Monitoring

References

  1. Keller AA, Zheng Y, Robinson TH. 2004. Determining critical water quality conditions for inorganic nitrogen in dry, semi-urbanized watersheds. JAWRA 40(3): 721-735. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2004.tb04455.x/abstract

Links

Disclaimer

This page may contain student work completed as part of assigned coursework. It may not be accurate. It does not necessary reflect the opinion or policy of CSUMB, its staff, or students.