TMDL for Nutrients in Lower Salinas River Watershed, Monterey County, California
This summary page is based on the Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region progress report on Total Maximum Daily Load for Nutrients and other TMDL projects for the Lower Salinas River Watershed, in Monterey County, California. This summary was prepared by the Spring 2011 ENVS 560/L Watershed Systems class at CSUMB.
Contents
Project Definition
The California Regional Water Quality Control Board for the Central Coast Region (CCRWQCB) is currently developing a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) project for nutrients in the Lower Salinas River Watershed in Monterey County. The CCRWQCB presented a progress report in June 2010 that contains background information, provisional nutrient targets, and a compilation of water quality data of water bodies in the region. Although the progress report identifies potential sources of nutrient loads, the source analysis portion of the TMDL project is still pending.
This TMDL project will address the nutrient related impairments in the 303(d) listed water bodies of the Lower Salinas River watershed. The 2006 303(d) List of Impaired Waterbodies is the current and active list for the California Central Coast. In 2010 the CCRWQCB presented an updated list in its 2010 Integrated Report, but this report is still waiting for approval by the USEPA. The following table contains the water bodies and the nutrient-related reason for their listing in both the 2006 active list and in the 2010 list:
Water Body | 2006 Listed Impairment | 2010 Listed Impairment |
---|---|---|
Alisal Creek | Nutrient | Chlorophyll-a, Nitrate |
Alisal Slough | Not Listed | Low Dissolved Oxygen, Nitrate |
Blanco Drain | Not Listed | Low Dissolved Oxygen, Nitrate |
Chualar Creek | Not Listed | Ammonia (Unionized), Nitrate |
Esperanza Creek | Not Listed | Nitrate |
Espinosa Slough | Not Listed | Ammonia (Unionized), Nitrate |
Gabilan Creek | Nitrate | Ammonia (Unionized), Nitrate |
Merrit Ditch | Not Listed | Ammonia (Unionized), Low Dissolved Oxygen, Nitrate |
Moro Cojo Slough | Ammonia (Unionized),Low Dissolved Oxygen | Ammonia (Unionized), Low Dissolved Oxygen |
Natividad Creek | Nitrate | Ammonia (Unionized), Low Dissolved Oxygen |
Old Salinas River | Not Listed | Chlorophyll-a, Low Dissolved Oxygen, Nitrate |
Old Salinas River Estuary | Ammonia (Unionized), Low Dissolved Oxygen, Nutrients | Nutrients |
Quail Creek | Nutrients | Ammonia (Unionized), Low Dissolved Oxygen, Nitrate |
Salinas Reclamation Canal | Ammonia (Unionized), Low Dissolved Oxygen | Ammonia (Unionized), Low Dissolved Oxygen, Nitrate |
Salinas River (lower, estuary to near Gonzales Rd
Crossing) |
Nitrate, Nutrients | Nitrate |
Salinas River Lagoon (North) | Nutrients | Nutrients |
Santa Rita Creek | Nitrate | Ammonia (Unionized), Low Dissolved Oxygen, Nitrate |
Tembladero Slough | Ammonia (Unionized), Nutrients | Chlorophyll-a, Nitrate, Nutrients |
Problem Statement
Shaelyn
Beneficial Uses (BUs) of Listed Waterways
Waterbody | MUN | AGR | PRO | IND | GWR | REC1 | REC2 | WILD | COLD | WARM | MIGR | SPWN | BIOL | RARE | EST | FRESH | COMM | SHELL |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Old Salinas River Estuary | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||
Salinas River Lagoon (North) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||
Tembladero Slough | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||
Espinosa Lake | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||||||
Espinosa Slough | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||||||
Salinas Reclamation Canal | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||||||
Alisal Creek | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||||
Blanco Drain | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||||||
Salinas River, dnstr of Spreckels Gage | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||
Salinas River,Chualar to Spreckles | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
- Municipal and Domestic suppy (MUN)
- Agriculture (AGR)
- Industrial Process (PRO)
- Industrial Service (IND)
- Ground Water Recharge (GWR)
- Water Contact Recreation (REC1)
- Non-Contact Water Recreation (REC2)
- Cold Freshwater Habitat (COLD)
- Warm Freshwater Habitat (WARM)
- Estuarine Habitat (EST)
- Wildlife Habitat (WILD)
- Rare, Threatened, or Endangered Species (RARE)
- Migration of Aquatic Organisms (MIGR)
- Spawning, Reproduction, and/or Early Development (SPWN)
- Biological Habitats of Special Significance (BIOL)
- Shellfish Harvesting (SHELL)
- Commercial and Sport Fishing (COMM)
- Freshwater replenishment (FRESH)
Data Analysis
Shaelyn
Numeric Target
Kathy
Linkage Analysis
Kathy
TMDL Development
Natalie
- target concentration
The TMDL target for nutrients for the lower Salinas valley is identified as a numeric target. The target concentrations vary based on the locations of the water bodies within the Salinas Valley. These preliminary target concentrations are based on the 95th percentile of CCAMP reference sites. These reference sites might not be representative of "valley floor streams, sloughs and water conveyance structures"(progress report), which are more commonly found in the Salinas Valley.
The target allowable concentrations are established for phosphorus and nitrogen. The allowable numeric targets were calculated using the NNE (nutrient numeric endpoints) benthic biomass predictor tool. This tool predicts biological responses based on nutrient conditions present in the water body. The numeric targets for nutrient concentration are temperature dependent. The classifications for water temperature are either warm or cold. Parameters that are included in the predictor tool include nutrients (natural and anthropogenic), canopy closure, water temp, latitude, flow velocity and depth.
- goal
- allowable levels
- The provisional target concentrations are -table on page 107
- example?
Margin of Safety
Natalie
A margin of safety is used to account for the uncertainty in the linkage between nutrient loads and nutrient the nutrient pollutant concentrations in the receiving water body.
- SLO calculated nutrient TMDL margin of safety "based on the difference between the total maximum daily load and the allocated load"
- "takes into account any lack of knowledge concerning the relationship between effluent limitations and water quality"
- Uncertainties accounted for in the margin of safety include...
- limited data(how many years do we have?)
- these discrete values have been estimated based on a specific amount of parameters and categorized primarily based on temperature and does not necessarily account for the interaction of the parameters
- model may not be represnetative of the actual environmental conditions
- rain patterns vary from one year to the next so dilutions vary
- is it built in?
- whats the order of magnitude-range of margins of saftey
- the basis for this
- typical example
- range that one might want to consider is ...
Critical Conditions and Seasonal Variation
The TMDL progress report has not addressed the “critical” environmental factor for nutrient loading in the Lower Salinas River Watershed, in which a slight change could lead to exceeding the water quality objectives. However, the progress report does specify some indicators that can impair the beneficial uses of the regional water bodies (progress report).
Previous TMDLs in the Lower Salinas River Watershed have not included critical conditions (TMDLs in the Monterey Bay Region of California), however critical conditions for a Nutrient TMDL may be advisable due to the high occurrence of nutrient loading for agriculture in the Salinas Valley. The TMDL approved for the Santa Clara River in 2003 included critical condition (Santa Clara River Nitrogen TMDL). Although the climate around the Santa Clara River is drier, that water body is similar to the Lower Salinas River in seasonal flow and the effects of the first big storm (first flush). Although not a perfect approach (Keller et al. 2004), the Santa Clara River TMDL makes an attempt to incorporate the increased impairment hazard presented by seasonal variation [1].
TMDL Allocations
Roger
Public Participation
- Central Coast Water Board often present TMDL project reports at public meetings to solicit comments during different stages and to present preliminary findings of the report.
- Public comments should be incorporated into the report where appropriate.
- California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) issues will likely need to be addressed. Staff should prepare documents to demonstrate any potential impacts and present alternative schemes and implementation strategies.
Implementation and Monitoring
Michelle
Implementation
Monitoring
References
- ↑ Keller AA, Zheng Y, Robinson TH. 2004. Determining critical water quality conditions for inorganic nitrogen in dry, semi-urbanized watersheds. JAWRA 40(3): 721-735. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2004.tb04455.x/abstract
Links
Disclaimer
This page may contain student work completed as part of assigned coursework. It may not be accurate. It does not necessary reflect the opinion or policy of CSUMB, its staff, or students.