Difference between revisions of "Ocean Harbor House Seawall"

From CCoWS Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Links)
(Links)
Line 31: Line 31:
 
*[[Agencies that are lead applicants in CEQA]]
 
*[[Agencies that are lead applicants in CEQA]]
 
*[[Hydrology and Water Quality Components of Central Coast CEQA Documents]]
 
*[[Hydrology and Water Quality Components of Central Coast CEQA Documents]]
 +
*[[List of Environmental Consultants in the Central Coast Area]]
  
 
==Disclaimer==
 
==Disclaimer==
  
 
This page may contain students's work completed as part of assigned coursework. It may not be accurate. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion or policy of [[CSUMB]], its staff, or students.
 
This page may contain students's work completed as part of assigned coursework. It may not be accurate. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion or policy of [[CSUMB]], its staff, or students.

Revision as of 21:44, 3 April 2013

The Ocean Harbor House was concerned over coastal erosion to their property. A seawall was erected to aid in prolonging waves from impacting the structures. This page describes the process that occurred.

Background

The Ocean Harbor House is comprised of 172 condominiums located on Del Monte Beach in Monterey,CA. It was initially constructed in the 1960's and had various additions through the years. Because the structure was built in close vicinity to the ocean, concerns over coastal erosion, wave impact, storm surge, and property damage accumulated through the years. This led the associated homeowners to investigate protection solutions. The homeowners applied to both the California Coastal Commission and City of Monterey for a permit to construct a 585 foot seawall.[1]

Environmental Impact Report

Acting as the lead agency, the Monterey Planning Division of the City of Monterey, created an environmental impact report. It was reported that the proposed seawall would generate a peninsula effect around the structure. The sandy beach area surrounding the structure would erode leaving the structure extending out towards the ocean. This was deemed aesthetically displeasing resulting in a loss of visual character. In addition the beach would no longer be continuous preventing beach goers from full access therefore reducing recreational function and use.[2]

Lawsuit

The homeowners of the Ocean Harbor House sued the California Coastal Commission over the fee imposed for the seawall installation.

Documents

State Clearinghouse All

References

  1. [Ocean Harbor House Homeowners Association v. California Coastal Commission https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDUQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Flaw.wustl.edu%2Flanduselaw%2Fcases%2FOceanHarbor-v-CCC.doc&ei=kLtUUdSZCZDSigKpuoBo&usg=AFQjCNHvECrV7MmoOerT9m3fH-b7sWbcPA&sig2=2ydzTL3iG-inn-7snf-BLw&bvm=bv.44442042,d.cGE]
  2. [Ocean Harbor House Homeowners Association v. California Coastal Commission https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDUQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Flaw.wustl.edu%2Flanduselaw%2Fcases%2FOceanHarbor-v-CCC.doc&ei=kLtUUdSZCZDSigKpuoBo&usg=AFQjCNHvECrV7MmoOerT9m3fH-b7sWbcPA&sig2=2ydzTL3iG-inn-7snf-BLw&bvm=bv.44442042,d.cGE]

Links

Disclaimer

This page may contain students's work completed as part of assigned coursework. It may not be accurate. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion or policy of CSUMB, its staff, or students.