Difference between revisions of "Riparian corridors in the California Central Coast Region"
(→References) |
(→To Date) |
||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
===To Date=== | ===To Date=== | ||
| − | * Hilty and Merenlender (2004) found that mammalian predators in northern California were 11 times more likely to be found in riparian habitats then in the upland vineyards. | + | * Hilty and Merenlender (2004)<ref>Hilty JA, Marenelender AM. 2004. Use of riparian corridors and vineyards by mammalian predators in northern California. Conservation Biology 18:126-135. http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/118784158/PDFSTART<ref/> found that mammalian predators in northern California were 11 times more likely to be found in riparian habitats then in the upland vineyards. |
* Crome et al. (1994) demonstrated riparian habitats harbor more bird species then human planted windbreaks. | * Crome et al. (1994) demonstrated riparian habitats harbor more bird species then human planted windbreaks. | ||
* Harris et al. (1996) showed that buffered zones around streams facilitate movements of animals such as black bears and forest dependent birds. | * Harris et al. (1996) showed that buffered zones around streams facilitate movements of animals such as black bears and forest dependent birds. | ||
Revision as of 23:05, 28 March 2017
A watershed-related issue examined by the ENVS 560/L Watershed Systems class at CSUMB.
Contents
Summary
Riparian corridors are important in California's Central Coast Region because they serve as wildlife corridors for local fauna, provide flood, erosion and temperature control, and help maintain water quality. The topography and the mixed land use in the region makes riparian corridors crucial for support surrounding ecosystems.
A riparian zone [1] is a strip of land whose physical and biological character is overwhelmingly determined by its proximity to a body of running water. Riparian zones can exist along perennially and as well as seasonally flowing water-bodies.
The main issue regarding riparian corridors in the Central California Coast region is the increase of human development reducing the occurrence of natural riparian zones that threatens and impedes the overall utility of the watershed and its various ecological processes.
Case Studies
Monterey Bay is hemmed by three distinct coastal ranges: the Santa Cruz Mountains to the north, the Gabilan Range to the east, and the Santa Lucia Range to the south. These ranges are separated from one another by the broad alluvial plain of the Salinas Valley [2], an area of intense agricultural activity. Maintaining connectivity between these ranges is seen as an important conservation measure for species with large territorial requirements. The Santa Cruz Mountains, for example, are believed to be too small to support a viable population of mountain lions. Corridors connecting those ranges have been identified, but no studies have been done to prove or disprove their utility. In Salinas Valley, where most land use is agricultural, there is little cover for animals to transverse across the valley, and waterway channels and riparian habitats are likely being utilized by traveling animals.
Resources at stake
Ecological and geomorphological
- Biodiversity In theory, riparian corridors conserve biodiversity by ensuring that species have the ability to migrate, colonize, and interbreed. Migration refers to a species' seasonal movements. Riparian corridors connect habitat utilized by migratory species at different times of the year. Colonization refers to population establishment. Riparian corridors enable species to colonize new areas when local resources have been exhausted. Interbreeding refers to the exchange of genetic information between disparate individuals and populations. Riparian corridors conserve genetic diversity by maintaining access to a larger gene pool. There is a growing body of evidence that riparian corridors facilitate biodiversity [3].
- Streambank stability
- Flood control
- Temperature regulation
Agricultural and Residential
- Water quality
- Property value
Stakeholders
In the central coast region stakeholders include:
- Private and public land owners whose lands border or contain riparian habitats
- U.S. Fish and Wildlife service
- U.S. Forest Service
- National Park Service
- California Department of Parks and Recreation
- Conservation agencies such as The Nature Conservancy
- Agricultural interest groups such as the California Farm Bureau[1].
Laws, Policies, & Regulations
California Assembly Bill No. 2785 [2](approved by Gov. Sep 26, 2008) revises the Significant Natural Areas Program "to investigate, study, and identify those areas in the state that are most essential as wildlife corridors and habitat linkages and prioritize vegetative data development in those areas". The funds would be provided by the Wildlife Conservation Board from the moneys made available by The Safe Drinking Water, Water Quality and Supply, Flood Control, River and Coastal protection Bond Act of 2006.
The Natural Community Conservation Planning (NCCP) Act of 1991 (AB 2172) provides for multi-species habitat conservation planning (MSHCP), which is recognized as an effective way to preserve the species while minimizing economic disruptions. Several MSHCP’s have been developed in California, with the cooperation of developers, federal and state agencies, and local communities. Different habitats including riparian zones and species can be protected under MSHCPs.
Recent food safety recommendations for agriculture in the Salinas Valley identified riparian habitat as food safety hazards. Vegetable retailers have pressured shippers and processors, which in turn have pressured farm operations to remove riparian vegetation in order to continue contracts. In addition, the practice of installing deer fences has greatly increased along the Salinas river and other areas bordering habitat due to food safety concerns.
Systems
The issue deals with the hydrological system, and the riparian ecosystem surrounding it. Specifically it deals with aquatic and terrestrial biota. Ecological sytems on the landscape level are at stake here, as large traveling predators often greatly effect populations of other species.
Research
To Date
- Hilty and Merenlender (2004)Cite error: Closing
</ref>missing for<ref>tag
Cite error: <ref> tags exist, but no <references/> tag was found
