Difference between revisions of "The Carmel River Watershed"
Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
=== Dam Removal === | === Dam Removal === | ||
− | Incremental motion between the Pacific and North American tectonic plates has periodically broken the crust in the Carmel Watershed. Various studies have determined that several faults show evidence of motion in Quaternary time (< 2 million years) and some have moved much more recently (Curry, 1984; Norman Janke Associates, 1989). The trace of the Cachagua fault is covered by the sediment stored in [[San Clemente Dam]] and it is estimated that a severe earthquake with a magnitude of up to 7.1 could hit the basin on the Tularcitos fault system, which is not far away. Therefore, San Clemente Dam is among the least safe in California '''cite this (DWR, 2003). | + | Incremental motion between the Pacific and North American tectonic plates has periodically broken the crust in the Carmel Watershed. Various studies have determined that several faults show evidence of motion in Quaternary time (< 2 million years) and some have moved much more recently (Curry, 1984; Norman Janke Associates, 1989). The trace of the Cachagua fault is covered by the sediment stored in [[San Clemente Dam]] and it is estimated that a severe earthquake with a magnitude of up to 7.1 could hit the basin on the Tularcitos fault system, which is not far away. Therefore, San Clemente Dam is among the least safe in California '''cite this (DWR, 2003). In addition to seismic hazard, sedimentation issues also drive efforts to promote dam removal. |
=== Erosion === | === Erosion === | ||
− | The chief erosive processes in the Carmel Valley are bedrock landslides, shallow soil slips, rock fall, stream incision and widening, and slope gullying. Grading for roads and buildings locally over-steepens these slopes, greatly accelerating the rate of slope failure and erosion. For this reason, nearly the entire Carmel Watershed is rated as highly susceptible to erosion. | + | The chief erosive processes in the Carmel Valley are bedrock landslides, shallow soil slips, rock fall, stream incision and widening, and slope gullying. Grading for roads and buildings locally over-steepens these slopes, greatly accelerating the rate of slope failure and erosion. For this reason, nearly the entire Carmel Watershed is rated as highly susceptible to erosion. However, sediment sources that maintain fish spawning habitat are impeded by the San Clemente and Los Padres dams, reducing their capacity to 90% and 50%, respectively. Additionally, in response to sediment starvation, the river channel has cut downward into its bed several meters, leaving a generally narrower, single-thread channel, with a well-defined riparian corridor |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
+ | '''Delete/move?'''Multiple studies '''cite: Willis et. al. (2001) and Rosenberg (2001)''' slope-failure processes are a common occurrence in the region. There is apparently a high risk of creating landslides on any steep slopes of the watershed if roads are poorly constructed. Landslides presently are a significant source of both natural and anthropogenic sediment in the basin. | ||
== Projects == | == Projects == |
Revision as of 10:45, 9 April 2013
Nestled between the Sierra de Salinas and Santa Lucia Mountain Ranges on the Central California Coast, the Carmel River Watershed is composed of countless small tributaries that all drain into the Carmel River, eventually forming the Carmel River Lagoon at Carmel River beach, which periodically breaches into the Pacific Ocean.
Contents
Location
The Carmel watershed is the northernmost of a series of northwest-southeast trending valleys dissecting the rugged Santa Lucia mountains of the California Coast Ranges. The Sierra de Salinas forms the northeastern divide of the watershed and the northern terminus of the Santa Lucia Mountains forms the southwestern divide.
The watershed divides rise to approximately 1400 m (4500 ft) along the Sierra de Salinas and soar to 1500 m (4800 ft) along the Santa Lucia Range with Ventana Double Cone providing the maximum elevation of 1480 m (4853 ft). Water drains 656 km2 (256 mi2) of land, following both overland and subterranean routes to reach the coastal Carmel lagoon and eventually the Pacific Ocean. Characterization studies have divided the Carmel River Watershed into 25 subwatersheds based on natural topographic divides.
Watershed Components
Main Stem
Dams
Subwatersheds
The Carmel River Watershed incorporates a large range of annual precipitation throughout the watershed and complex geology that gives rise to a complex distribution of soil types, erosion rates, landslide potential, aquifers, recharge areas, ecosystems and human land use. For this reason, proper resource management practices may be very specific to certain watersheds rather than globally relevant. Characterization studies have divided the watershed into 25 subwatersheds based on natural topographic and hydraulic divides. Listed below are links to some of the more prominent and issue oriented subwatersheds:
- Pine Creek
- Miller Creek
- Los Padres Creek
- Rana Creek
- Mid-Carmel River
- Hitchcock Canyon
- Las Garzas Creek
- Robinson Canyon
Tributaries
Lagoon
The Carmel River Lagoon connects the Carmel River to the Pacific Ocean in winter months when flows are high. A sandbar forms and closes the river mouth during the late spring and summer months [1].
Physical Characteristics
Hydrology
Geology
Geology plays a first order role in determining the physical condition of the watershed and is a complex quilt of igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary rocks in part stitched together by faults of varying ages. The physical strength of the rocks and soils determine the erodibility, landslide potential, and ecosystem and land-use potential. Tectonically, the Carmel Watershed is carved into the Salinian Block, a piece of crust that began its existence near the Mojave desert and moved northward, dragged by the Pacific plate for the past 20 million years.
The Santa Lucia and Sierra de Salinas Ranges have experienced substantial uplift rates for the past two million years cite this!!!(Ducea et al., 2003). The uplift of the mountains keeps the rivers in a state of general downward incision. Many of the headwater streams and larger tributaries of the Carmel watershed occupy geologically youthful “V”-shaped canyons with sharp dividing ridges, this geometry leads to a naturally high sediment rate and a state of episodic down-cutting of the river channels. This kind of tectonically active, youthful terrain is commonly in balance with slope failure; bherefore, they are very susceptible to slope failure and extremely high sediment yield when disturbed and over steepened during road or subdivision grading.
Lowlands and valleys are typically created where less resistant material is preferentially eroded over a long time, leaving more resistant material as uplands and watershed divides. The Carmel Watershed has physical landscape diversity because it is underlain by a wide range of soils and bedrock types, and because the landscape is cut by myriad active faults. The Carmel Valley owes its character and location to ongoing erosion that has taken advantage of weak rock, crushed in splays of the still active Tularcitos fault zone.
Habitat
Sensitive Species
Issues
Water Supply
Dam Removal
Incremental motion between the Pacific and North American tectonic plates has periodically broken the crust in the Carmel Watershed. Various studies have determined that several faults show evidence of motion in Quaternary time (< 2 million years) and some have moved much more recently (Curry, 1984; Norman Janke Associates, 1989). The trace of the Cachagua fault is covered by the sediment stored in San Clemente Dam and it is estimated that a severe earthquake with a magnitude of up to 7.1 could hit the basin on the Tularcitos fault system, which is not far away. Therefore, San Clemente Dam is among the least safe in California cite this (DWR, 2003). In addition to seismic hazard, sedimentation issues also drive efforts to promote dam removal.
Erosion
The chief erosive processes in the Carmel Valley are bedrock landslides, shallow soil slips, rock fall, stream incision and widening, and slope gullying. Grading for roads and buildings locally over-steepens these slopes, greatly accelerating the rate of slope failure and erosion. For this reason, nearly the entire Carmel Watershed is rated as highly susceptible to erosion. However, sediment sources that maintain fish spawning habitat are impeded by the San Clemente and Los Padres dams, reducing their capacity to 90% and 50%, respectively. Additionally, in response to sediment starvation, the river channel has cut downward into its bed several meters, leaving a generally narrower, single-thread channel, with a well-defined riparian corridor
Delete/move?Multiple studies cite: Willis et. al. (2001) and Rosenberg (2001) slope-failure processes are a common occurrence in the region. There is apparently a high risk of creating landslides on any steep slopes of the watershed if roads are poorly constructed. Landslides presently are a significant source of both natural and anthropogenic sediment in the basin.
Projects
Stakeholders
- Monterey Peninsula Water Management District (MPWMD)
- California-America Water Company (Cal-Am)
- Monterey County Water Resources Agency
- Carmel River Steelhead Association (CRSA)
- ...
Timeline
Pick out key dates from this link
CSUMB Courses Relevant to the Carmel Watershed
Links
- Maps of the Carmel River Watershed
- California Central Coast Gage Locations
- Carmel River Lagoon
- San Clemente Dam
- Reservoirs
- Los Padres Reservoir
- San Clemente Reservoir
- Publications
- CSUMB-CCoWS Carmel Watershed Assessment
- EcoViz:SEP_Focus_Sites
Cite error: <ref>
tags exist, but no <references/>
tag was found